Search results

  1. Empirical Cane

    UL is a 2.5 point favorite (Updated 9/14)

    100% agree on ND. Based on N=1, not even close to CFBPO form.
  2. Empirical Cane

    UL is a 2.5 point favorite (Updated 9/14)

    After watching both games 3 times now L'Ville just looked better. That doesn't mean they are world beaters, it doesn't even mean they are good. It also doesn't mean Miami sucks. The compare was with our Canes performance last Thursday--and thats the body of work we have to go by at this...
  3. Empirical Cane

    UL is a 2.5 point favorite (Updated 9/14)

    Winning 55-38 can exist in the same universe as our Canes D under performing by giving up 38 points. Go Canes...beat L'Ville 100-0
  4. Empirical Cane

    UL is a 2.5 point favorite (Updated 9/14)

    A few things friend... I personally haven't observed the exact inverse vis a vis Satterfield and Manuela. In my opinion, Satterfield has all the makings of a solid and successful HC. Manuela? Not so so much. It's more than "his side of the ball", because let's face it, our Canes D slipped...
  5. Empirical Cane

    UL is a 2.5 point favorite (Updated 9/14)

    Satterfield, so far, appears to be a vastly superior HC v Manuela. Then again that bar is set low. Satterfield vs de facto HC Lashlee? I'm not sure the gap is that large, if at all. Rhett needs just a touch more time given the albatrosses of Manuela and Baker.
  6. Empirical Cane

    UL is a 2.5 point favorite (Updated 9/14)

    I'm surprised L'ville isn't already favored by a TD. Comparing both teams opening performances, it is going to be a long day for our Canes without improvements. Possible for sure, but O still a work in progress and D isn't going to hold down Cardinals all game
Back
Top