Search results

Please, explain to me in detail, who we should have hired, that was available, and how we were going to pay more if it was required. And then go check your little girl entitlement complex, because I'm an alum before I'm a "fan." I actually understand the university, don't think it's only a...

OK Princess. I get that you won't look at the defensive rankings since Diaz arrived. You're just gonna whine and ***** and pitch a fit because your little panties are in a twist that we don't allow zero points every game. I'm not gonna sit here and teach third grade for you. So, keep sobbing...

Our defense has been statistically elite in many categories (including Total D) since Diaz arrived. Ignore it because you don't like it, or don't believe in crazy things like numbers, but it doesn't change the fact the defense went from "worst in Miami history" to consistently very good to elite.

And this is why 90% of 'Canes fans are morons. Please, explain to me in detail, who we should have hired, that was available, and how we were going to pay more if it was required. I'm betting money you're about to say Mike Leach. Because that would be a stupid thing to say, and that would be...

I disagree that it's an indictment on Diaz at this point. He indicated very strongly from day one that we needed to rebuild the culture. Even the casual observer would have seen that as well. Don't get me wrong -- it looks bad. But 16 games or whatever in, I'm not sold either way. Let guys...

Yeah I kind of thought that might be what you meant, but the crux of it is, even IF the young guys come on, it still means we only have 3-4 reliable WR's. As far as I'm concerned at this point Harley and Wiggins should be shown the door, and Pope is not far behind.

This goes to what I was strongly saying before we played Clemson. What happens when we get punched in the mouth? Well, we failed epically against Clemson, which was probably to be expected. But did fare well against Pitt, with a solid defensive front that attacked our OL all day. That's...

1) If King's arm strength just isn't there, it's not gonna improve. 2) The WR's (starting trio) are two juniors and a senior. If they can't catch easy balls, let alone contested ones, at this point, they're not gonna turn it around this season either. 3) I think we've seen the best this OL is...

While I tend to be on your side of this argument the vast majority of the time, I think there are some real, serious glaring issues that can't be justified by any of the above. -The receivers can't catch, and the starters are all upperclassmen. That's not about limited practice or new guys...

While I don't disagree with this at all, if you have the option of getting another free year of education at a very good private university, you take it.

So you didn't read the part when I said "sure the receivers suck, but I'm not putting that on King?"

He's underthrown a $#!+load of passes. Are the receivers too fast now?

He doesn't have the arm strength and he's way, way too short. Dude would never see the field, pun absolutely intended. Sure, the receivers have been a disaster, and I'm not putting that on King. I'm just finding it funny how so many "experts" were talking about him being a big time prospect...

1) Pope > Harley 2) If X is "just as good as Harley," he shouldn't be on the team either.

The notion of King "coming back" is pretty funny at this point, because I don't know where he's gonna go. He's definitely not an NFL QB.