Search results

Exactly. I'm honestly wondering what goes through the "0-16" crew's minds. NO team in the history of the sport has succeeded using that method but we should do it because we have the picks lol. They have $120+ million in cap money and enough draft capital to do whatever they'd like to complement...

So Flores should have risked his and Grier's job for a potential franchise QB? Take a look at how many teams have had the #1 over the years and observe how many actually traded it away. Also observe the teams that choose the QB first and the situation that they're in; a new HC comes in majority...

With Philbin at the helm. Tannehill was sacked 93 times in two years and our OL was always unstable. How do you think Luck would have turned out? It can be tremendous trade value but we're in need of a QB so that's what the pick is most likely going to be.

See Kansas City who picked Mahomes. Again, coaching & having a stable front office that knows how to identify talent that fits the scheme>> Point to any team in recent history besides the 2012 Colts, Luck was a transcendent prospect, who were able to capitalize from the #1 pick.

:sanford2:

Young is going top 3 so we're currently out of range but Okudah would be perfect and someone I feel that Flores would covet more anyways. Just have to find a true FS and he'll have his equivalence to a NE secondary.

We go 0-16, free agents don't want to come here next year, Flores is immediately put on the hot seat and maybe even fired for fielding the worst team in the history of the sport, Grier is fired, we're scrutinized for years to come, and have start all over again with a new HC and GM who haven't...

I don't think many fans are rooting for wins but I'm personally not about to be down because my team is winning. How is betting on a QB later "outlier" mentality if the current landscape fits the criteria? Lamar- end of the 1st Mahomes- #10 Watson- #12 Rodgers-#24 Russ- 3rd Dak- 4th Even if...