Search results

I remember growing up watching the Bowl games. It was such a great tradition with different conferences playing and it was a matter of conference/regional pride. Multiple bowls could impact who the NC would be. Which conference were better? They ruined tradition and there is none today...

As soon as the national champion is crowned immediately after the last regular season game then yes. Until then, the post season still kind of means something. You had some very good opinions though.

Glad that is settled.

More rules to level the playing field? Why should any school be punished for success or rewarded for failure? I would argue that expanding the playoffs would help to level the playing field since recruits won't field pressured to attend 1 of the 4-6 schools always in the playoffs. Live in...

Maybe blowouts but there is also money in it for the programs perhaps. Also, what about a 10-2 Penn State who lost by a total of 7 points? 9-3 Auburn who played without their starting QB for 2 of those losses? Division I football stands alone so either they are the smartest or there are other...

Why have NFL playoffs? FCS playoffs? NHL playoffs? March Madness? Do they still play baseball? NBA playoffs Why have NCAA Baseball Regionals because no team with a record of like 31-28 can win their regional The list is literally endless with the exception of NCAA Division I Foozeball. No...

Technically, with the portal if a player doesn't want to play in more games they can just transfer to a perennial loser.

Bowls were killed with the BCS except the ones being rotated. If smart, you can still incorporate bowls into the playoffs and in that case it would help them mean something again.