Search results

Then you don't take Waddle or Smith, but you grab a WR later in the draft. Time has proven that WR are for the most part a dime a dozen and like RB better taken later. We could have "settled" on the best defensive player in the draft or drafted the NW tackle instead of giving away a third...

What is accurate is that it was a chit show. We sit where we traded with SF we have our choice of maybe Waddle or Smith, Parsons, and/or Slater. By not taking Sewell we had to **** away a third round pick just to move up 8 spots because they were probably shocked somebody moved up in the draft...

Miami needs a center and 4 are gone. I heard so much hype about Miami coaching the senior bowl maybe they can use that inside knowledge to move up and grab that Whitewater kid..

Just take a center next pick and go home...

Correct me if I am wrong but we traded back into the first round last year for our All-Pro nickel player did we not? They did say he returned punts too though!

I have no idea what the Dolphins are doing. Neither does Grier. I guess we didn't need a RB or we just watched Denver with popcorn grabbing Williams right in front of our noses. OT sitting there...Let's go safety. Surprised they didn't trade back into first round to take him.

You say what? Bears fans haven't suffered enough. Eagles fans? Suffer some more. Remember when the Eagles kicker missed the extra point during the super bowl those poor Eagles won, with time running out in the quarter? Cost me $500 on the square and good thing I was in a hotel room on...

Outside of their injury histories I am ok with Miami's picks as well until you factor in... We traded Pitts or Chase AND a future first AND third rounder for...Waddle (You really have to let that sink in). Grier is like us on those mock draft sites where you just have fun making trades and...

No, they should take a small WR. Lions couldn't run to the board quick enough to give their Sewell pick.

Waddle. Don't agree but they are the smart people.

So he had no time to throw AND they were 24th or so in rushing. Screams OL to me. OL and RB make everyone look good including Tannehill. You say Wallace and Marshall but there is Brown from UNC, Moore, Toney, and no doubt others we haven't heard about like Thielen from Mankato who played...

I think it is the former because there hasn't been anything negative on Sewell. I am just in the Pitts or Sewell camp...Or find a sucker somewhere to give up both a first and second round pick. I would even trade with Chicago or Washington and then maybe use a couple later round picks to slide...

History has shown that some of the game's greatest WR are obtained after that huge drop-off to the second round. Bengals played that quick game last year correct? The year Mr. Burrow took that beating? They take Chase I will feel good about the fish running up to the podium to select a...

At Bama, he had one heck of an OL and RB (plural). Tannehill became good at TN because of OL and RB. Bengals see their QB with a broken knee and are going to go WR...Cracks me up really. Atlanta? I guess Jones, Ridley, et. al. just aren't enough and if they can score 60 they will win 60-59...

If Sewell, I would like to see them get aggressive if Parsons falls. Need a top center. RB. With Fuller now I think look for hidden WR gem later. But with top tackle and center...Our OL is set for 10 years and games are won in the trenches. Now, if Pitts/Chase are available I rethink lol

Chase or Pitts gone we need to take Sewell or trade down with Denver and maybe get another future 1st rounder. If I am Atlanta I am trading out of 4 if not picking a QB. Too many needs. Of course, the Falcons will just continue losing 45-41 by picking Pitts. I would take Fields over Lance...