Search results

  1. 407cane

    The End of the Striker position

    The chain isn't causing receivers to drop balls And it's not causing us to lose games. It's not the SOLE reason for our success with turnovers but it HELPED us become #1 in takeaways. There is absolutely no negative of it at all, the only ones would could think that are just fans wrong...
  2. 407cane

    The End of the Striker position

    that is correct, but if the players like it who tf cares? obviously forcing turnovers is not a problem
  3. 407cane

    The End of the Striker position

    I think people don't understand that when you play madden and you choose KC offense there's a difference between how someone like mark richt would call the plays and someone like andy reid would call the plays baker calls a similar defense to manny, NOT the same and he sure as **** doesn't...
  4. 407cane

    The End of the Striker position

    the play caller is the problem. We also play way more zone than we did when manny was DC, partly because of baker's tendencies but also because of CB talent Manny goes back to calling plays and gets baker out or let's him play on the sideline somewhere idc, and his more traditional man...
  5. 407cane

    The End of the Striker position

    we're #1 in takeaways in the power 5 since it's debuted. Might be dumb but are we implying that the players don't like it and it didn't help change the culture of forcing turnovers? because if so, you're way off base
Back
Top