i remember the days when you basically knew guys were gonna have break out seasons and knew who was going to contribute. now it's all about the potential to breakout and what type of impact they "could have".

Why did you post that in third person?

fire al golden with that midwest favoritism

gfer1988 said:

i remember the days when you basically knew guys were gonna have break out seasons and knew who was going to contribute. now it's all about the potential to breakout and what type of impact they "could have".

Click to expand...

Quality post for sure.

westcoastcanes said:

Why did you post that in third person?

Click to expand...

He thought he was on his other throw away

He will NOT be a factor this year.

12 to 15 sacks this year. Beastly creature.

these videos never load for me.

**** of an athlete. Underrated. Rooting for him.

M3N said:

He will NOT be a factor this year.

Click to expand...

Probably right.

Considering the fact that no DL has had a great year since the Golden Era, ill go with the under on the breakout campaign. No DL is allowed to breakout

D_G87 said:

Considering the fact that no DL has had a great year since the Golden Era, ill go with the under on the breakout campaign. No DL is allowed to breakout

Click to expand...

"Allowed" is the operative word here.

Individuals are not allowed to dominate on a Golden/D'onofrio defense. That would go against their philosophy. In Golden"s mind, each player must be a selfless cog in the Hegelian whole or "Wefense". We can't have physically dominant and explosive DE's rushing the passer and getting sacks. That would be too "selfish".